The Genesis of Divine Names: A Semantic and Ontological Inquiry into Shīʿī Kalām

Islamic Studies

Interdisciplinary Studies

Author: Ḥujjat al-Islām ʿAlī-Riḍā Bahrāmī
Reviewed by: Morteza Karimi

ʿAlī-Riḍā Bahrāmī, Darāmadī bar Naẓariyyah-yi Ḥudūth-i Asmāʾ-i Ilāhī (An Introduction to the Theory of the Temporal Origination of Divine Names), 1st ed., 1 vol., Qom: Dār al-Ḥadīth Publications, 1398 SH (2019 CE), 320 pp.

The intricate subject of Divine Names (Asmāʾ-i Ilāhī) and their relationship to God’s Essence (dhāt) has occupied the center stage of Islamic theological, mystical, and philosophical inquiry for centuries. Not only has this issue shaped doctrinal divisions among Muslim theologians and philosophers, but it has also stimulated comparative religious debates across Abrahamic traditions. The conceptual problem of how God’s Names relate to His Essence, especially regarding their origin (ḥudūth) or eternity, raises questions fundamental to understanding tawḥīd (Divine Unity). The book Darāmadī bar Naẓariyyah-yi Ḥudūth-i Asmāʾ-i Ilāhī (An Introduction to the Theory of the Temporal Origination of Divine Names) by Ḥujjat al-Islām ʿAlī-Riḍā Bahrāmī aims to revisit and critically explore this question by combining a Qurʾānic and ḥadīth-based approach with semantic analysis and comparative doctrinal evaluation.

This work contributes significantly to the contemporary Shīʿī kalām (theology), as part of a broader project on divine ontology spearheaded by the Group of Thematic Studies at the Pazhūhishkadih-yi Kalām-i Ahl al-Bayt (a) (Ahl al-Bayt Theology Research Institute). The book is a scholarly attempt to offer an epistemologically rigorous, semantically grounded, and doctrinally sensitive framework for understanding the ḥudūth (origination) of Divine Names in Islamic thought.

Ḥujjat al-Islām ʿAlī-Riḍā Bahrāmī is a scholar trained in both traditional ḥawzah learning and academic Islamic studies. He earned his bachelor’s degree in Ḥadīth Studies from the Seminary of Qom in 1386 Sh/2007 CE, followed by an M.A. in Ḥadīth Studies (Theology) from Qurʾān and Ḥadīth University in 1391 Sh/2012 CE. He later completed his Ph.D. in Ḥikmat-i Mutaʿāliyyah (Transcendent Theosophy) at the Pazhūhishgāh-i ʿUlūm-i Insānī wa Muṭāliʿāt-i Farhangī (Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies).

This educational trajectory reflects Ḥujjat al-Islām Bahrāmī’s interdisciplinary approach, drawing on kalām, philosophy, and ḥadīth studies. His methodological orientation is especially notable for incorporating semantic network analysis, ḥadīth authentication, and doctrinal critique. He stands among a new generation of Shīʿī scholars attempting to rearticulate traditional theological doctrines using modern academic tools while remaining rooted in classical textuality.

The central thesis of An Introduction to the Theory of the Temporal Origination of Divine Names revolves around the question: Are God’s Names eternal and co-substantial with His essence, or are they temporally originated? Bahrāmī examines this question from three vantage points:

  1. The Qurʾān and ḥadīth: Do Islamic scriptural sources indicate a temporal origination of the Divine Names?
  2. Muslim intellectual history: How have Muslim thinkers—theologians, mystics, and philosophers—addressed this issue?
  3. Doctrinal coherence: How does one reconcile the idea of ḥudūth with established theories of Divine Unity such as ʿayniyyat (identity) or ziyādah (superaddition)?

An Introduction to the Theory of the Temporal Origination of Divine NamesḤujjat al-Islām Bahrāmī argues that understanding the ontological status of Divine Names requires analyzing their Qurʾānic and narrational usage, tracing the semantic development of key terms like ḥudūth and ism (name), and investigating the epistemological implications of their functional roles in theology and worship.

The book is divided into four chapters, each building upon the last to construct a multifaceted view of the theory of the temporal origination of Divine Names.

Chapter One: General Concepts

This introductory chapter sets out the theoretical framework, terminology, and epistemological assumptions. Bahrāmī defines central terms such as ism, ṣifah (attribute), and ḥudūth, drawing distinctions between their philosophical, theological, and mystical interpretations. He outlines his methodological approach, emphasizing semantic analysis, intertextual study of Qurʾān and ḥadīth, and doctrinal critique. This chapter establishes the groundwork for later discussions by acknowledging the complexity of theological language and the diversity of interpretive traditions.

Chapter Two: The Origination of Divine Names in the Qurʾān and Ḥadīth

The second chapter investigates the origin and function of Divine Names within Islamic literature. Bahrāmī constructs semantic networks across multiple Qurʾānic verses and correlates them with ḥadīths from Imāms of the Ahl al-Bayt (a). He analyzes key narrations addressing how God “revealed” or “manifested” His names and whether such manifestations imply temporality.

Chapter Three: The Origination of Divine Names from the Perspective of Muslim Scholars

In this chapter, Ḥujjat al-Islām ʿAlī-Riḍā Bahrāmī surveys classical and modern Muslim thought on the question of Divine Names. He presents contrasting views from major schools. Each thinker’s position is evaluated concerning their metaphysical commitments and epistemic priorities. This chapter helps readers understand the doctrinal stakes behind apparently abstract discussions of Divine Names and Attributes.

Chapter Four: The Views of Muslim Scholars Weighed through Analysis and Critique

The final chapter offers a critical appraisal of the views discussed previously. Bahrāmī compares the implications of affirming or denying ḥudūth for divine simplicity, unity, and transcendence. Bahrāmī also critiques approaches that reduce Divine Names to mere linguistic constructs or over-metaphysicalize them, advocating for a balanced ontology rooted in revelation.

Darāmadī bar Naẓariyyah-yi Ḥudūth-i Asmāʾ-i Ilāhī is a rigorous and thought-provoking work that contributes meaningfully to modern Shīʿī theology. Among its strengths are:

  • Textual fidelity: The book carefully engages with Qurʾānic and ḥadīth sources, particularly Shīʿī narrations, providing a textual foundation often neglected in contemporary theology.
  • Methodological sophistication: Bahrāmī’s use of semantic networks and structured doctrinal critique reflects a mature approach that bridges traditional and modern methods.
  • Interdisciplinary relevance: The discussion intersects with ontology, philosophy of language, mysticism, and kalām, making it valuable across disciplines.

However, the book also presents some challenges:

  • Complexity of language: Its technical vocabulary and dense argumentation may limit accessibility to non-specialist readers.
  • Scope constraints: While the book covers many views, it could engage more deeply with contemporary Western theological parallels or analytic philosophy of religion.

In sum, this work is a commendable scholarly contribution that revives a foundational theological debate with clarity, depth, and balance. For students and researchers of Islamic theology, especially those engaged in Shīʿī studies, it offers a fresh and nuanced model for examining the divine through the prism of His Names and Attributes.